目的 建立一种基于半胱氨酸偶联方式的抗体偶联药物抗Delta样蛋白3(DLL3)单抗-MPVP-PBD的质控方法。方法 本实验利用转基因细胞法,以转染了DLL3的HEK 293T细胞系为靶细胞测定抗DLL3单抗-MPVP-PBD的生物学活性;利用ELISA法测定结合活性;利用CE-SDS和SEC-UPLC测定大小异质性;利用iCIEF分析电荷异质性;分别利用HIC-HPLC和LC-MS对药物抗体偶联比(drug-to-antibody ratio,DAR)进行测定;利用RP-HPLC测定游离小分子药物含量。结果 抗DLL3单抗-MPVP-PBD的生物学活性EC50平均值为(4.02±0.22)ng·mL-1,RSD为5.47%;结合活性EC50平均值为(12.67±1.09)ng·mL-1,RSD为8.60%;非还原CE-SDS 完整IgG峰面积百分比为(25.58±0.15)%、HHL为(36.56±0.24)%、轻链为(14.61±0.13)%等,RSD均小于2%;还原CE-SDS 重链和轻链峰面积之和为(96.97±0.31)%,RSD为0.32%;SEC-UPLC主峰面积为(98.68±0.05)%,多聚体(1.32±0.05)%,RSD均小于5%;iCIEF 主峰面积为(68.19±0.68)%,主峰等电点(8.28±0.01),RSD均小于2%;LC-MS测定DAR为2.08(完整相对分子质量水平)和1.73(轻重链水平);HIC-HPLC测定DAR为(1.86±0.03),0-药物为(19.49±0.28)%,1-药物为(11.21±0.20)%,2-药物为(48.64±0.68)%,3-药物为(5.21±0.40)%,4-药物为(15.44±1.19)%,RSD均小于10%; LC-MS测定了偶联位点占有率;RP-HPLC测定游离小分子药物为(23.20±0.82)%,RSD为3.53%。结论 本实验初步建立了抗体偶联药物抗DLL3单抗-MPVP-PBD的质控方法,该质控方法具有保证产品安全、有效、质量可控的特点,可作为其常规检测方法,为我国相关抗体偶联药物的质量检测提供了参考依据。
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish a quality control method for anti-DLL3 monoclonal antibody-MPVP-PBD based on cysteine conjugation. METHODS The cell line HEK 293T transfected with DLL3 was used as the target cells to determine the biological activity against of anti-DLL3 McAb-MPVP-PBD, and the binding activity was determined by ELISA. Size heterogeneity was measured by CE-SDS and SEC-UPLC, and charge heterogeneity was analyzed by iCIEF. Drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) was determined by HIC-HPLC and LC-MS, respectively. The contents of free small molecular drugs were determined by RP-HPLC. RESULTS The average biological activity EC50 of anti-DLL3 McAb-MPVP-PBD was (4.02±0.22) ng·mL-1 and RSD was 5.47%. The average binding activity EC50 was (12.67±1.09) ng·mL-1 and RSD was 8.60%. Peak area percentages of intact IgG, HHL and LC from non-reduced CE-SDS analysis were (25.58±0.15)%, (36.56±0.24)% and (14.61±0.13)% respectively, RSD was less than 2%. The sum of peak area percentages of HC and LC from reduced CE-SDS analysis was (96.97±0.31)% and RSD was 0.32%. The area percentages of main peak and aggregate from SEC-UPLC analysis were (98.68±0.05)% and (1.32±0.05)% respectively, with RSD less than 5%. The main peak area of iCIEF was (68.19±0.68)%, and the isoelectric point of the main peak was (8.28±0.01), RSD was less than 2%. The DAR determined by LC-MS was 2.08 (intact molecular weight level) and 1.73 (light and heavy chain level). The contents of 0-drug, 1-drug, 2-drug, 3-drug and 4-drug were (19.49±0.28)%, (11.21±0.20)%, (48.64±0.68)%, (5.21±0.40)% and (15.44±1.19)% from HIC-HPLC analysis respectively(RSD<10%), by which the DAR was calculated as (1.86±0.03). The occupation ratio of conjugation sites was determined by LC-MS. Free small molecular drug was (23.20±0.82)% from RP-HPLC analysis and RSD was 3.53%. CONCLUSION The quality control methods of anti-DLL3 monoclonal antibody-MPVP-PBD for antibody-conjugated drugs are preliminarily established in this study. This method has the potential to ensure product safety, effectiveness and quality controllability. They can be used as a routine detection methods and provide a reference for the quality detection of related antibody-conjugated drugs in China.
关键词
抗体偶联药物 /
质量控制 /
生物学活性 /
药物抗体偶联比 /
游离小分子药物
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
antibody-drug conjugate /
quality control /
bioactivity /
drug-to-antibody ratio /
free small molecular drug
{{custom_keyword}} /
中图分类号:
R917
{{custom_clc.code}}
({{custom_clc.text}})
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] SIEVERS E L, SENTER P D. Antibody-drug conjugates in cancer therapy[J]. Ann Rev Med, 2013, 64: 15-29.
[2] GOLDMACHER V S, KOVTUN Y V. Antibody-drug conjugates: using monoclonal antibodies for delivery of cytotoxic payloads to cancer cells[J]. Ther Deliv, 2011, 2(3):397-416.
[3] ALLRY S C, OKELEY N M, SENTER P D. Antibody-drug conjugates: targeted drug delivery for cancer[J]. Curr Opin Chem Biol, 2010, 14( 4): 529-537.
[4] DIAMANTIS N, BANERJI U. Antibody-drug conjugates: an emerging class of cancer treatment[J]. Br J Cancer, 2016, 114(4):362-367.
[5] LEAL M, SAPRA P, HURVITZ S A, et al. Antibody-drug conjugates: an emerging modality for the treatment of cancer[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2014, 1321( 8):41-54.
[6] YU C F, WANG W B, ZHENG F, et al. Determination of drug antibody ratio by intact size-exclusion chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry[J]. Chin J Pharm Anal (药物分析杂志), 2016, 36(1):31-35.
[7] KOVTUN Y V, AUDETTE C A, MAYO M F, et al. Antibody-maytansinoid conjugates designed to bypass multidrug resistance[J]. Cancer Res, 2010, 70(6):2528-2537.
[8] SOCHAJ A M, SWIDERSKA K W, OTLEWSKI J. Current methods for the synthesis of homogeneous antibody-drug conjugates[J]. Biotechnol Adv, 2015, 33(6 Pt 1):775-784.
[9] LIU H, MAY K. Disulfide bond structures of IgG molecules:structural variations, chemical modifications and possible impacts to stability and biological function[J]. mAbs, 2012, 4(1):17-23.
[10] WAKANKAR A, CHEN Y, GOKAR N Y, et al. Analytical methods for physicochemical characterization of antibody drug conjugates[J]. mAbs, 2011, 3(2): 161-172.
[11] TEICHER B A. Antibody-drug conjugate targets[J]. Curr Cancer Drug Targ, 2009, 9(8): 982-1004.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
基金
国家“重大新药创制”科技重大专项项目资助(2018ZX09736016-007)
{{custom_fund}}